Not everyone agrees with Trump’s framing. Critics caution that applying RICO to political activity could set a dangerous precedent, blurring the line between free expression and criminal enterprise. They argue that political donations, training programs, and advocacy — even when controversial — fall within the rights protected by the First Amendment.
Legal experts also note that pursuing such a case would face enormous challenges in court. Proving coordinated criminal activity, rather than political or philanthropic engagement, would require an extraordinary level of evidence.
What Seniors Should Know About RICO and Politics
Seniors, many of whom are deeply invested in the themes of law, order, and accountability, may see this as a broader reflection of the times: a nation struggling to decide how far influence can go before it becomes interference.
Potential Global Implications
Continue reading…