Political figures often speak in vague, coded language. But critics say there was nothing vague about what Trump said this time. It wasn’t a wink or a dog whistle — it was a clear message to the press and the public that retaliation could be coming.
And he didn’t deny it.
Critics argue that this kind of language isn’t just inappropriate — it’s potentially illegal. The First Amendment doesn’t just protect journalists — it protects all of us. Once those rights start to erode, they don’t stop at the newsroom.
The First Amendment Under Fire
Continue reading…