The appeal also argues that the trial judge’s decisions contributed to an unfair environment. Trump’s attorneys claim the jury instructions and evidentiary rulings did not meet constitutional standards for transparency, clarity, or fairness.
Republican lawmakers echoed this sentiment, insisting that the case against Trump was flawed from the beginning. Several pointed to the fact that nondisclosure agreements and settlements are common practices in the corporate world, emphasizing that such actions are not inherently criminal.

Meanwhile, Trump addressed the situation publicly, stating that the appeal marks an effort to “expose political weaponization” and defend the rights of all Americans. He maintained that his focus remains on broader goals, including his political agenda and ongoing campaign efforts.Continue reading…