In its brief statement, the Court wrote that showing a traveler’s sex at birth “no more offends equal-protection principles than displaying their country of birth.” The majority framed the issue as one of historical recordkeeping, not discrimination.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, joined by the Court’s two other liberal justices, issued a sharp dissent. She called the decision a “senseless sidestepping of the obvious equitable outcome,” warning that it would cause “immediate injury without adequate justification.”
How We Got Here
Continue reading…