Several parents noted that hearing a government official suggest they may have “caused” their child’s condition simply by following standard medical advice was deeply painful.
At the policy level, lawmakers began fielding questions from constituents who were understandably confused. Some asked whether new regulations on painkillers were coming. Others worried whether Tylenol, something used safely for generations, was now dangerous to use during pregnancy.
The overwhelming response from medical experts was clear: no official guidelines have changed, and acetaminophen remains considered safe when used appropriately.
Public health specialists explained that acetaminophen is one of the few fever-reducing medications deemed safe for pregnant women — and fever during pregnancy can itself pose risks if left untreated.
Therefore, discouraging its use without evidence could inadvertently cause more harm than good. Fever, uncontrolled pain, and untreated infections can affect both mother and baby, highlighting why accurate information is essential.
As media coverage intensified, analysts noted that Kennedy’s remarks had touched off a wider cultural discussion about the tension between skepticism and science. Some people feel drawn to alternative explanations for complex conditions because they want certainty in a world that rarely offers it.
Others argue that misinformation thrives in environments where trust in institutions is already fragile. Experts insist this is precisely why public officials need to be especially careful with their words.
While Kennedy defended his right to raise questions, critics countered that leadership requires not just questioning established science, but also respecting the rigorous processes through which scientific conclusions are made.Continue reading…
