
As the immediate protests outside the White House faded from view, the broader debate triggered by President Trump’s announcement continued to intensify across legal, political, and international arenas.
At the center of this debate was not only the situation in Venezuela, but also fundamental questions about how the United States exercises power on the global stage and how far presidential authority can extend without explicit legislative approval.
Experts in constitutional law noted that the distinction between a limited operation and sustained military involvement can quickly blur, particularly when airstrikes or claims of territorial control are mentioned. Continue reading…