Earlier in the day, President Trump had publicly described Maduro as a “narco-terrorist” allegedly overseeing a criminal enterprise that posed a direct threat to U.S. security.
He claimed that Maduro and his wife were in federal custody in New York and would face serious criminal charges. Framing the announcement as decisive action after years of alleged criminal conduct, Trump portrayed the move as both overdue accountability and a demonstration of American resolve.
However, critics quickly raised questions about the legal basis and broader implications of such actions.
Constitutional scholars, former diplomats, and members of Congress cautioned that even if allegations against a foreign leader were severe, the use of military force and claims of detention required clear legal justification and transparent processes. Continue reading…
