María Corina Machado Awarded 2025 Nobel Peace Prize, Trump Overlooked

These assertions helped build an image of Trump as a major peacemaker, and many supporters anticipated that he would be recognized accordingly. Yet, when the Nobel Committee’s official announcement came, it was María Corina Machado’s name that was called, a decision that surprised some and pleased others who follow global human rights causes. The Norwegian Nobel Committee released an official statement explaining their choice, stating: “The Norwegian Nobel Committee has decided to award the 2025 #NobelPeacePrize to María Corina Machado for her tireless work promoting democratic rights for the people of Venezuela and for her struggle to achieve a just and peaceful transition from dictatorship to democracy.”

Machado, who initially trained as an engineer before entering politics, has become one of the most outspoken critics of Nicolás Maduro’s authoritarian government. Despite being banned from running for office, facing government persecution, and enduring significant personal risks, she has remained steadfast in her fight for free elections, human rights, and democratic governance in Venezuela. Her relentless advocacy has made her a beacon of hope for many Venezuelans and a symbol of resistance to oppression. The Nobel Prize will likely bring increased international attention and support to her cause, while simultaneously drawing sharp condemnation from Maduro’s regime. The prize ceremony is scheduled for December 10th in Oslo, Norway.

While Machado’s international recognition grows, Donald Trump continues to highlight his own foreign policy initiatives. Recently, he unveiled a new peace plan aimed at resolving the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas, claiming it represented a historic breakthrough. Trump stated, “Israel and Hamas have both signed off on the first phase … this is a GREAT day … and we thank the mediators from Qatar, Egypt, and Turkey.” However, despite these positive statements, military operations, including airstrikes, have continued in the region. Analysts caution that the first phase of this plan would still leave significant portions of Gaza under occupation, underscoring the fragile and tentative nature of any peace agreement. Critics argue that the ongoing violence and complex political realities make lasting peace difficult to achieve. Continue reading…