No federal indictment, state prosecution, or immigration enforcement action has ever emerged from the allegations. Independent reviews have challenged key elements of the narrative, citing a lack of verified evidence tying Omar to any criminal wrongdoing.
By emphasizing what could happen under federal law if wrongdoing were proven, Leavitt positioned the controversy as an open legal question rather than a settled factual matter.
In her statements, Leavitt referenced potential violations ranging from federal marriage fraud statutes to state-level prohibitions on incest, as well as tax implications related to joint filings.
Continue reading…