When a man who spent more than a decade inside the United States Secret Service expresses concern over the safety of a former president, his warning warrants careful consideration. This is not idle speculation from a political commentator seeking attention, nor is it partisan hyperbole aimed at stirring public fear. It is, instead, the perspective of someone who has devoted his professional life to anticipating and mitigating threats to the nation’s highest office. Dan Bongino, the former Secret Service agent who protected presidents from both political parties, is intimately familiar with the constant and evolving dangers that accompany life in the executive protection sphere. He worked during one of the most consequential periods in modern American security history, when terrorism, domestic unrest, and global threats were reshaping the understanding of what it means to provide security at the highest level. His insights are grounded in experience, not conjecture, and when he publicly acknowledged growing concerns about Donald Trump’s safety, the remark deserved far more than a brief media mention or a wave of partisan commentary. Unfortunately, the broader media landscape, driven by legal analyses, ideological narratives, and relentless cycles of outrage, largely ignored the gravity of his warning. What Bongino communicated was a professional assessment rooted in decades of training, firsthand observation, and intimate knowledge of how risk manifests and multiplies—especially when multiple, independent threat streams converge around a single figure in a politically polarized environment. Continue reading…
