They argued that the charges were not about what Becca had done, but about what she refused to stop doing. That her mistake was not breaking the law in spirit, but breaking an unspoken rule: that mourning should be quiet, private, and brief. That persistence should eventually give way to acceptance. That questions should fade once the official version had been issued.
From that perspective, the arrest felt like a warning. Not just to Becca, but to anyone who believed that recording, speaking, and refusing to move on were forms of participation rather than provocation.
Between those positions, the story hardened into two competing narratives, each insisting on its own legitimacy.
In one version, the arrest was inevitable. A necessary response to repeated boundary violations. A demonstration that rules exist for a reason, and that enforcement cannot bend indefinitely to personal circumstance. Continue reading…