Expert advises parents to seek their baby’s permission before changing diapers.

However, Carson’s proposal has generated significant criticism and ridicule from many quarters. Some detractors argue that the notion of asking a baby for permission before changing their diaper is simply impractical, unnecessary, or even absurd. Rowan Dean, editor of The Spectator Australia, dismissed it as “lefty lunacy,” a dismissive phrase used to describe what he sees as excessive political correctness or over-sensitivity. Similarly, John Rosemond, a well-known psychologist and columnist on parenting, sharply criticized Carson’s approach. Rosemond wrote that the idea would have been considered deranged in the recent past and claimed that instead of promoting healthy family dynamics, it fosters confusion, mistrust, and dysfunction.

On social media, reactions ranged from humor and sarcasm to anger and disbelief. Some users joked that if one must get a baby’s consent, then why not ask a pet cat before cleaning its litter box? Others argued that a crying baby already communicates clear consent — or even an urgent demand — for a diaper change. Many questioned Carson’s expertise and real-world experience with children, suggesting that her ideas were disconnected from the practical realities of parenting.

Yet not everyone condemned Carson’s message outright. Some parents and commentators acknowledged that while the example might seem extreme or symbolic, the underlying principle of teaching respect and communication is valuable. These supporters pointed out that babies and toddlers communicate in complex ways long before they develop language skills and that recognizing and honoring this communication can foster healthy emotional development. They applauded Carson for encouraging a dialogue about consent and for challenging traditional assumptions about infant care.

This debate also highlights a broader cultural conversation about parenting philosophies and how modern caregivers navigate raising children in a rapidly changing social landscape. For many parents, the practice of “asking” for consent in daily caregiving tasks may feel like an additional way to promote respect and autonomy. For others, focusing on attentive observation and responsive care without necessarily verbalizing consent may feel more natural and practical.

It is important to note that this approach does not mean neglecting a baby’s immediate needs. Babies cannot be expected to fully understand or control every interaction, and parents must respond promptly to physical needs such as diaper changes to ensure health and comfort. Instead, Carson’s suggestion seeks to add a layer of mindfulness and respect, encouraging caregivers to engage with their infants in a way that honors their personhood from day one.

As the online discourse continues, it serves as a reminder of the diversity of parenting styles and cultural values surrounding child-rearing. Some view Carson’s ideas as progressive steps toward empowering children, while others see them as overreach or impractical idealism. Ultimately, the decision to incorporate consent language into infant care is deeply personal and varies depending on individual beliefs, cultural backgrounds, and parenting philosophies.Continue reading…