Survivors argue that the delay protects not just reputations, but systems that failed repeatedly, allowing exploitation to continue unchecked for years.
When Epstein died in custody, many feared the truth would die with him, sealed behind classification stamps and procedural fog.
The current legal challenge suggests that fear was justified, but also that survivors are no longer willing to wait quietly.
By seeking an independent monitor, Phillips is asking the court to prioritize dignity, clarity, and accountability over institutional comfort.
Special masters are rare in cases like this, typically reserved for moments when confidence in oversight has completely eroded.
If granted, the appointment would signal a stunning rebuke of the DOJ and set a precedent for survivor-led accountability in federal cases.
Supporters argue this is exactly the point: when systems fail catastrophically, extraordinary measures become not radical, but necessary. Continue reading…
