That message was not subtle. Danish officials have grown increasingly wary of repeated public statements from Washington emphasizing Greenland’s importance to U.S. national security. The island’s geographic location, vast natural resources, and proximity to emerging Arctic shipping routes have made it a focal point of global attention as climate change reshapes the region.
U.S. leaders have been explicit about their interest. Donald Trump has repeatedly argued that Greenland is critical to American defense strategy, pointing to its position between North America and Europe and its relevance to missile defense and early-warning systems. He has framed the issue as one of strategic necessity, suggesting that the United States must ensure robust defense capabilities in the Arctic as rival powers expand their presence.
Danish officials have consistently responded by underscoring that Greenland is part of the Kingdom of Denmark and that any decisions about its future must be made by Greenland’s elected government and its people. Greenland, while enjoying a high degree of self-rule, remains under Danish sovereignty, and Copenhagen has been careful to emphasize that this arrangement is grounded in international law.
Following the Washington talks, Rasmussen confirmed that Denmark and the United States agreed to establish a joint working group focused on Arctic security cooperation. The purpose of the group is to continue dialogue, exchange assessments, and explore areas of practical collaboration. However, Rasmussen was equally clear that participation in such discussions does not imply any willingness to revisit questions of sovereignty or ownership. Continue reading…
